Pdf the dimensionality of the verbal aggressiveness scale. At first glance, you may think that these findings are. Indicate how often each statement is true for you personally when you try to influence other persons. A rationale is developed for studying verbal aggression apart from other types of aggression, and several studies developing a verbal aggressiveness scale are reported. The vas has 20 items, 10 that are 10worded negativelyaggressively, and 10 worded positivelykindly. This scale enables you to score the severity, frequency, and impact of each behaviour. My verbal aggression score was 66 putting me in the moderate range verbal aggressiveness scale, and again i agree. If your client exhibits no sign of that category of behaviour, mark the no box and go to. Likert based scale is intended to measure verbal aggression. Physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger and hostility. Individuals who rely on verbal aggressiveness are viewed as less credible, have less satisfying relationships, and resort to physical aggression more often. The standard verbal aggressiveness scale is composed of 10 negatively worded items e.
The prca was chosen because the mtercuitural and mterethnic contexts were expected tocorre1ate with the four contexts represented m the prca. Type aggression psychology in the youtube search box and notice many interesting documentaries about psychological discoveries about human aggression, such as this one. Indirect speech acts are, of course, not always instances of verbal abuse, and not all passive aggressiveness is a kind of verbal abuse, as passive aggressiveness often isnt verbal at all. The bussperry aggression questionnaire bpaq is a popular measure of aggression in adults. Start studying interpersonal communications chapter 11. Verbally aggressive messages attack an individuals selfconcept to inflict psychological pain.
The overt aggression scale for the objective rating of verbal and physical aggression. The scales showed internal consistency and stability over time. Infante and wigleys 1986 verbal aggressiveness scale vas is a widely accepted and frequently used measure of trait verbal aggression. Infante and wigley developed a trait measure of verbal aggressiveness. Indicates that, unlike their adult counterparts, children do not perceive. Finds that the twofactor solution of the argumentativeness scale and the verbal aggressiveness scale was a reasonable overall fit to samples of both u. The aggression scale consists of 4 factors, physical aggression pa, verbal aggression va, anger a and hostility h. The following table contains information and references for self and teacher report measures of aggressive behavior and victimization in youth. Author farber, eugene w burgecallaway, katherine g. Expression of anger scale ea, the verbal aggressiveness scale ve, the physical aggressiveness scale ph, the passive aggressiveness scale pa, and the selfconfidence scale sc. Verbal aggressiveness and argumentativeness in physical.
Trait verbal aggressiveness is defined as the predisposition to attack the self. Verbal aggressiveness in communication has been studied to examine the underlying. The aq measures aggressiveness across four domains. Infante and wigleys scale is often scored as unidimensional. Although the scale is almost always scored as if it were unidimensional, previous factor analytic studies provide evidence that it is multidimensional with two distinct factors. Ten of the items are phrased so the high score is the most aggressive response, while. Participants were 9 undergraduate students enrolled at a small southern university who completed the assertivenessresponsiveness.
The purpose of the study was to examine intrinsic motivation of athletes and its relation with instructors verbal aggressiveness and leadership style. The verbal aggressiveness scale this survey is concerned with how we try to get people to comply with our wishes. Finds the internal consistency and temporal stability of the adolescent argumentativeness scale and the adolescent verbal aggressiveness scale are reliable when used to assess these predispositions in adolescent populations, and that they demonstrated satisfactory face, concurrent, convergent, and discriminant validity. The sample of the study consisted of 168 athletes 95 boys and 73 girls, 15 19 years old m 16. Verbal aggressiveness and leadership style of sports. This study is aiming at examining 1 physical education teachers selfperceived verbal aggressiveness and argumentativeness, 2 students perceptions about verbal aggressiveness and argumentativeness developed by their teachers, in order to assess the communicational accordance between students and teachers perceptions in elementary, junior and high schools. Argumentativeness is a predisposition to recognize issues and advocate strongly for a position. The list represents all measures for which documentation was available and may not be.
The authors describe the design and reliability of a rating scale that measures aggressive behaviors in adults and children. The construct validity and factor structures of the argumentativeness scale arg. The results indicated that the more people are seen as verbally aggressive, the less liked they are. In defense of the argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness scales. An interpersonal model is developed that specifies the types of verbally aggressive messages in interpersonal relations, their effects, and their causes.
The total score for aggression is the sum of the factor scores. Instructor sociocommunicative style, argumentativeness. Verbal aggressiveness was chosen as a discriminant validity test. The research conducted so far has not directly examined exclusive small group relation communication and cohesion when dealing with argumentativeness and verbal aggression. The research has been based on a personality trait model that was used to conceptualize a very basic ideathat some aggressive behaviors are constructive and others are destructive. A good deal of research on argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness has been conducted in the communication discipline in this and the previous decade. Argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, and relational. Physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, and hostility. The text of the questionnaire and the method of computing results were presented at the end of the article. Questionnaire of aggressiveness in sport and business. How to use this scale for each of the 9 categories of behaviour there is a heading e. Verbal aggressiveness is the predisposition to attack the selfperception of others. The verbal aggressiveness scale measures the personality trait of verbal aggressiveness and has been widely used in communication research.
Second, the study examines whether particular characteristics e. Verbal aggressiveness scale vas the sourcebook of listening. Competitive aggressiveness and anger scale, caas consisting of two subscales was derived using principal component factor analysis with oblimin rotation. Article information, pdf download for verbal aggressiveness. In this quiz and worksheet, youll find questions that test your understanding about the difference between verbal aggressiveness and argumentativeness. The physical and verbal aggression segments of bussperry scale were adopted for. The development of a short scale measuring aggressiveness and anger in competitive athletes. Exploration of determinants of verbal aggressiveness and. The measurement of aggressive communication predispositions. The italian adaptation of the aq shows good psychometric properties fossati et al.
A study examined the relationship among instructor sociocommunicative style, argumentativeness, and verbal aggressiveness in the college classroom. Correlational analysis revealed that anger is the bridge between both physical and verbal aggression and hostility. Pdf the dimensionality of the verbal aggressiveness. Pdf verbal aggressiveness hample, 2008 dale hample. Although the scale is almost always scored as if it were. Verbal aggressiveness scale vas request pdf researchgate. Types of talk, verbal aggressiveness, communication climate 2 abstract significant research has investigated jack gibbs model of defensive and supportive communication, but little has explored the influence of the type of talk defensive or supportive on perceptions of communication climate and the role that verbal. Yudofsky sc, silver jm, jackson w, endicott j, williams d. Verbal aggression x 1 aggression against property x 2 autoaggression x 3 physical aggression x 4 total weighted score modified from kay sr, wolkenfelf f, murrill lm 1988, profiles of aggression among psychiatric patients.
The scale has been widely used in communication research. The dimensionality of the verbal aggressiveness scale. Pdf infante and wigleys 1986 verbal aggressiveness scale vas is a widely accepted and frequently used measure of trait verbal aggression find, read. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.
The development of a short scale measuring aggressiveness. Interpersonal communications chapter 11 flashcards quizlet. Another tool that will be employed is the argumentativeness scale from devitos communication handbook. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63, 452459. I do feel i balance well in separating people from their thoughts and options verbal aggressiveness scale. Verbal aggressiveness continued verbal aggressiveness is an assault on anothers self concept, rather than hisher position. The overt aggression scale for the objective rating of.
Infante and charles j w wigley iii, published on 010107. Men show a higher level of aggression than women archer, 2004. However, factor analytic studies have offered evidence that the scale is multidimensional. Communication behavior is considered verbally aggressive when an individual applies symbolic force to dominate, damage, defeat, or destroy another persons self. Higher scores indicate a greater propensity for trait aggression. Argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness as predictors of partnerperceptions of conflict styles during a simulated downsizing activity an extensive body of research has examined how the traits of argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness function within organizations e. Argumentative and aggressive communication in relational. The verbal abusers sneaky tactics psychology today. First, the study evaluates the reliability of selfreports of argumentativeness by comparing selfreported argumentativeness with two other reports of the same target.
299 454 1594 400 189 1084 1423 1279 786 426 1330 1031 1011 394 344 803 1422 345 1516 648 1595 1392 49 547 1503 1129 376 193 1615 807 277 1106 1431 859 1126 13 621 738 809